Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Jogging vs Running: What's the difference? Does it even matter?

A friend who was starting off on a walk-to-run program asked me once, "What's the difference between jogging and running?"

Both running and jogging are considered as forms of aerobic exercise. Diffen.com notes that both help the body to loose weight and make over-all improvements in one’s health. At the same time it distinguishes the two activities from each other based on intensity and effort required. "Running requires more effort than jogging. It is more intense than jogging" it states. "Running is defined as the fastest means to move on foot. It is an intense form of jogging and requires the runner to be athletic."

Jogging101.com makes a similar distinction. It states:

Jogging is considered a form of trotting or running at a slow or leisurely pace. Its main intention is to increase fitness with less stress on the body than from faster running.
There is a distinct difference between jogging and running. One is performed at a more comfortable, relaxed pace and primarily for cardiovascular fitness and weight loss. While, running, on the other hand, is generally done at a considerably faster pace where a mile is typically completed in 8 minutes or less.
Running is considered a competitive sport with finishers receiving medals and purses with the best times.

This distinction vividly reminds one of this quote from Dr. George Sheehan: "The difference between a jogger and a runner is an entry blank."

In The Complete Idiot's Guide to Jogging and Running, Bill Rodgers notes that "The debates about who's a jogger and who's a runner are endless and fierce" and adds, "Usually, the distinction is made in a condescending way, with running taken to be superior to jogging."

Indeed, while it may not be a big question for some, there are those who put a lot of importance on being called one or the other. Some runners detest being called a jogger and calling what they are doing jogging instead of running has the same effect. For them, it indicates inferiority.

But is there really a difference? If we say that a runner is faster than a jogger, then most of us would be joggers compared to the elite. "We're all slower than someone else," says Rodgers. "So let's scratch pace as what makes one person a jogger and another person a runner."

How about distance? How often one runs? Or one's reason for running?

Not even these would make any difference, according to Rodgers, and cites some interesting examples of elite runners covering less distance and running less often than most ordinary runners, yet they break national records, win major races and are at the top of the game. None would call them joggers. He also talks of people who faithfully put in the miles but who for one reason or another choose not to race, of a two-time New York City Marathon champion who "runs 10 miles most days at faster than 7:00 mile pace" but doesn't care to compete anymore. "Does that mean he's now a jogger?"

Simply put, Rodgers believes there isn't any difference between running and jogging. "Jogging, running - call it what you want. You'll know when you're doing more than walking," he writes.

And beginners shouldn't feel that there's some standard they have to measure up to, Rodgers adds. "There isn't; the only one that matters is your own satisfaction."

If you run, you are a runner. It doesn't matter how fast or how far. It doesn't matter if today is your first day or if you've been running for twenty years. There is no test to pass, no license to earn, no membership card to get. You just run.
--John Bingham

4 comments:

  1. Wow. I am curious as to what your own thoughts are on the running vs. jogging aspect. If running is not running until you are running sub 8 minute miles, I will not be a runner for quite some time. lol. As a whole, I believe that running is all RELATIVE to the person doing it. If your running pace is 10 minute miles and that is you going at it strong, then a 12 minute mile would be a jog I guess. Running slower than what you normally run at. Its like your car engine idling. You are still a car. Same thing applies to running, just because your pace is slower, you are still a runner, and when you run slower, you are still a runner, though jogging is just the term to imply that you are not running at 100% effort. But even if you are running at 70% effort, are you still running? It's complicated and as you mentioned in your post, I think it is just relative and is a difference of opinion. ELITE runners? Im not elite (yet) so I totally take their pace out of the equation. Take care man and have a great New Years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i totally agree with you, kenley. it's all relative to the person doing it. i may be running faster than most, but like everyone else, i have a turtle's pace compared to even the local elite. that, i believe, doesn't make me less of a runner than them. and my passion for the sport is nothing less than theirs. i go by this quote from 72-year old runner jay foonberg - "when i do the best i can with what i have, then i have won my race."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I remember having an argument with someone who insisted that most people who call themselves runners are "just" joggers. I told him we should change how we talk then. When when we chase our children at the mall it should be termed "jogging" after the children. Or we should be yelling at our kids... stop jogging!

    ReplyDelete
  4. i guess as bill rodgers said, joliz, the sad thing here is "the distinction is made in a condescending way, with running taken to be superior to jogging." but if you give it a second thought that fat guy or fat lady struggling through a 3k run gives just as much effort as another faster runner going for a personal best. the fact that they are running makes them winners and achievers, even if they are going slow.

    ReplyDelete